Machine learning-based estimation and clustering of statistics within stratigraphic models as exemplified in Denmark

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v53.8353

Keywords:

Convolutional neural network, Covariance model, Semivariogram modelling, Machine learning, Local stationarity

Abstract

Estimating a covariance model for kriging purposes is traditionally done using semivariogram analyses, where an empirical semivariogram is calculated, and a chosen semivariogram model, usually defined by a sill and a range, is fitted. We demonstrate that a convolutional neural network can estimate such a semivariogram model with comparable accuracy and precision by training it to recognise the relationship between realisations of Gaussian random fields and the sill and range values that define it, for a Gaussian type semivariance model. We do this by training the network with synthetic data consisting of many such realisations with the sill and range as the target variables. Because training takes time, the method is best suited for cases where many models need to be estimated since the actual estimation itself is about 70 times faster with the neural network than with the traditional approach. We demonstrate the viability of the method in three ways: (1) we test the model’s performance on the validation data, (2) we do a test where we compare the model to the traditional approach and (3) we show an example of an actual application of the method using the Danish national hydrostratigraphic model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boisvert, J.B. & Deutsch, C.V. 2011: Programs for kriging and sequential Gaussian simulation with locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances. Computers & Geosciences 37(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.021

Boisvert, J.B., Manchuk, J. & Deutsch, C.V. 2009: Kriging in the presence of locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances. Mathematical Geosciences 41, 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9229-1

Bongajum, E.L., Boisvert, J. & Sacchi, M.D. 2013: Bayesian linearized seismic inversion with locally varying spatial anisotropy. Journal of Applied Geophysics 88, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.10.001

Cressie, N.A.C. 1993: Statistics for spatial data. New York: Wiley.

Hansen et al. 2013: SIPPI: A MATLAB toolbox for sampling the solution to inverse problems with complex prior information: Part 1 – Methodology. Computational Geoscience 52, 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.004

Higdon D., Swall, J., & Kern, J. 1999: Non-stationary spatial modeling. In: Bernado, J.M. et al. (eds). Bayesian Statistics (6 ed.). 761–768. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hornik, K. 1991: Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks 4(2), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T

Iandola, F.N., Moskewicz, M.W., Ashraf, K., Han, S., Dally, W.J. & Keutzer, K. 2016: SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <1MB model size. ArXiv, abs/1602.07360. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.07360

Jo, H. & Pyrcz, M.J. 2022: Automatic semivariogram modeling by convolutional neural network. Mathematical Geosciences 54(1), 177–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09962-w

Kohonen, T. 1991: Self-organising maps: ophmization approaches. In: Kohonen, T., et al. (eds): Artificial Neural Networks. Pp. 981–990. Amsterdam: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-89178-5.50003-8

Li, Y., Baorong, Z., Xiaohong, X. & Zijun, L. 2022: Application of a semivariogram based on a deep neural network to ordinary kriging interpolation of elevation data. PLoS One 17(4), e0266942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266942

Madsen, R.B., Hansen, T.M. & Omre, H. 2020: Estimation of a non-stationary prior covariance from seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting 68(2), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12848

Madsen, R.B., Høyer, A.S., Andersen, L.T., Møller, I. & Hansen, T.M. 2022: Geology-driven modelling: A new probabilistic approach for incorporating uncertain geological interpretations in 3D geological modelling. Engineering Geology 309, 106833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106833

Mardia, K.V. 1990: Maximum likelihood estimation for spatial models in Spatial statistics: Past, present, and future. 203–253. https://doi.org/10.1068/a270615

Matheron, G. 1963: Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology 58(8), 1246–1266. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246

Pereira, Â. et al. 2023: Updating local anisotropies with template matching during geostatistical seismic inversion. Mathematical Geosciences 55(4), 497–519, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10051-3

Stisen, S., Ondracek, M., Troldborg, L., Schneider, R.J.M. & Til, M.J.V. 2020: National Vandressource Model. Modelopstilling og kalibrering af DK-model 2019. Danmarks og Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Rapport 2019/31, 23–27, https://doi.org/10.22008/gpub/32631

Zhou, L., Hongming, P., Wang, F., Zhiqiang, H. & Wang, L. 2017: The expressive power of neural networks: A view from the width. In: Guyon, I. et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, 7–8. New York: Curran Associates Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/32cbf687880eb1674a07bf717761dd3a-Paper.pdf (accessed October 2023)

Graphs in rows and columns

Published

17-11-2023

How to Cite

Falk, F. A., & Bødker Madsen, R. (2023). Machine learning-based estimation and clustering of statistics within stratigraphic models as exemplified in Denmark. GEUS Bulletin, 53. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v53.8353

Issue

Section

METHODS ARTICLE | SHORT